The CPC´s 100 Year Endeavour and the Other Meanings
One hundred years since the birth of a person, the beginning or end of a war or the founding of a political party is an anniversary that encourages us to remember history and look at the present, so that on this basis one can form an idea or image of the future. In my address I would not refer to some specific achievements of the CPC I mentioned in my introductory remarks. And also in my recent book 100 Years of the CPC which seems to find its way step by step to readers who agree, are willing and even able to support the idea of human society and the building of a global community with a shared future for the sake of peace and well-being of the people also in societies governed and led by the cognitive capitalism led by a few TNC(Transnational Company). Many of us know that the cognitive capitalism removes the person from the processes of production, sale, receipt and investment. Its program of actions and goals is voiced in the form of a book called The Big Reset, in the establishment of The Council for Inclusive Capitalism with the Vatican and in calls of Governments of any type and colour to prepare ourselves for dramatic changes. These include digitalization, cybernetization, distant education, diagnostics and many more. All is packed in words of freedom and the protection of human rights, although nearly everybody knows that the freedom is not a ready-made state. Therefore world politics has become quite startling and has acquired features of tragic farce, increasingly fanciful. Classical times, even those of confrontation, can only be reminisced about. The environment has become extremely contradictory: everything and everybody are very closely interconnected, but at the same time do not trust and fear each other. All is strange and it is unclear how to pursue a consistent policy. Such a transformation of international practices has different consequences; one of them is the emasculation (up to the complete loss of any sense) of political expert dialogue among international relations specialists, whose discussions have always accompanied official negotiations. As I was among such pundits in the past allow me a few words in regard to new challenges in international relations influenced by technologies and competing foreign policy models. You, the reader, diplomats and academicians may wish to consider them in your work together with the achievements, failure and experience gained within and over a period of 100 years of communist movements in a number of countries, incl. the PRC.